Picasso Creative Writing Method: To execute, communicate and share our "CREATIVE MISSION" as set out below - *Comprehensive Creative Creativity with curated articles, posts, blogs and studies from around the world that support or relate to this rich inter-disciplinary approach to sustainable life-long creations and imagination.
Our "Creative Mission" is to foster a rich, interdisciplinary dialogue that will convey and forge new tools and applications for creative, critical and philosophical thinking; engaging the world in the process. Through workshops, tutorials and social media platforms we also strive to entertain, educate and empower people - from individuals, to businesses, governments or not-for-profit groups; we aim to guide them in building a base of constructive ideas, skills and a Brain Fit paradigm - thereby setting the stage for a sustainable, healthy, and creative approach and lifestyle . These synthesized strategic "Critical Success Factors" - can then give rise to applied long-term life or business - Operating Living Advantages and Benefits.
And, at the same time, we encourage Charlie Monger's key attitude and belief - for and with all of whom we reach - " develop into a lifelong self-learner through voracious reading; cultivate curiosity and strive to become a little wiser (and more grateful)* everyday."
* CCC Added - Editor
Search This Blog
Friday, 13 July 2018
Teaching #critical thinking: An evidence-based guide
Perhaps the most effective way to foster critical thinking skills is to teach those skills. Explicitly. (Abrami et al 2008).
Studies suggest that students become remarkably better problem-solvers when we teach them to
analyze analogies
create categories and classify items appropriately
identify relevant information
construct and recognize valid deductive arguments
test hypotheses
recognize common reasoning fallacies
distinguish between evidence and interpretations of evidence
Do such lessons stifle creativity? Not at all. Critical thinking
is about curiosity, flexibility, and keeping an open mind (Quitadamo et
al 2008). And, as Robert DeHaan has argued, creative problem solving
depends on critical thinking skills (DeHaan 2009).
In fact, research suggests that explicit instruction in
critical thinking may make kids smarter, more independent, and more
creative.
Here are some examples--and some expert tips for teaching critical thinking to kids.
Teaching critical thinking may boost inventiveness and raise IQ
Richard Herrnstein and his colleagues gave over 400 seventh graders
explicit instruction in critical thinking--a program that covered
hypothesis testing, basic logic, and the evaluation of complex
arguments, inventiveness, decision making, and other topics.
After sixty 45-minute lessons, the kids were tested on a variety
of tasks, including tests the Otis-Lennon School Ability Test and Raven
Progressive Matrices (both used to measure IQ). The project was
remarkably effective.
Compared to students in a control group, the kids given
critical thinking lessons made substantial and statistically significant
improvements in language comprehension, inventive thinking, and even IQ
(Herrnstein et al 1986).
Teaching critical thinking in science class may help kids solve everyday problems
In another experimental study, researchers Anat Zohar and colleagues
tested 678 seventh graders’ analytical skills. Then they randomly
assigned some students to receive critical thinking lessons as part of
their biology curriculum.
Students in the experimental group were explicitly trained to
recognize logical fallacies, analyze arguments, test hypotheses, and
distinguish between evidence and the interpretation of evidence.
Students in a control group learned biology from the same textbook but got no special coaching in critical thinking.
At the end of the program, students were tested again. The
students with critical thinking training showed greater improvement in
their analytical skills, and not just for biology problems. The kids trained in critical thinking also did a better job solving everyday problems (Zohar et al 1994).
Tips for teaching critical thinking: What should parents and teachers do?
The short answer is make the principles of rational and scientific thinking explicit.
Philip Abrami and colleagues analyzed 117 studies about teaching
critical thinking. The teaching approach with the strongest empirical
support was explicit instruction--i.e., teaching kids specific ways to reason and solve problems. In studies where teachers asked students to solve problems without giving them explicit instruction, students experienced little improvement (Abrami et al 2008).
So it seems that kids benefit most when they are taught formal
principles of reasoning. And the experiments mentioned above suggest
that middle school students aren't too young to learn about logic,
rationality, and the scientific method.
If your school isn’t teaching your child these things, then it
might be a good idea to find some educational materials and work on
critical thinking skills at home.
I also wonder about the need to counteract the forces of irrationality. As I’ve complained elsewhere,
TV, books, “educational" software, and misinformed authority figures can discourage critical thinking in children.
And at home, parents may consider these recommendations made by Peter
Facione and a panel of experts convened by the American Philosophical
Association (Facione 1990).
The American Philosophical Association's tips for teaching critical thinking
• Avoid pushing dogma. When we tell kids to do things in a certain way, we should give reasons.
• Encourage kids to ask questions. Parents and teachers
should foster curiosity in children. If a rationale doesn’t make sense
to a child, she should be encouraged to voice her objection or
difficulty.
• Ask kids to consider alternative explanations and solutions.
It’s nice to get the right answer. But many problems yield themselves
to more than one solution. When kids consider multiple solutions, they
may become more flexible thinkers.
• Get kids to clarify meaning. Kids should practice
putting things in their own words (while keeping the meaning intact).
And kids should be encouraged to make meaningful distinctions.
• Don’t confine critical thinking to purely factual or academic matters. Encourage kids to reason about ethical, moral, and public policy issues.
• Get kids to write. This last recommendation doesn’t come
from Facione or the APA, but it makes good sense. As many teachers
know, the process of writing helps students clarify their explanations
and sharpen their arguments. In a recent study, researchers assigned
college biology students to one of two groups. The writing group had to
turn in written explanations of their laboratory work. The control group
had to answer brief quizzes instead. At the end of the term, the
students in the writing group had increased their analytical skills
significantly. Students in the control group had not (Quitadamo and
Kurtz 2007).
References: Tips for teaching critical thinking to kids
Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Wadem A, Surkes M A, Tamim R,
Zhang D. 2008. Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking
skills and dispositions: a stage 1 meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res.
78:1102–1134.
Facione PA and the American Philosophical Association. 1990.
Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of
Educational Assessment and Instruction. In: Research Findings and
Recommendations, Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
Herrnstein RJ, Nickerson RS, Sanchez M and Swets JA. 1986. Teaching thinking skills. American Psychologist 41: 1279-1289.
Quitadamo JJ, Faiola CL, Johnson JE and Kurtz MJ. 2008.
Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general biology.
CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7: 327-337.
Quitadamo IJ and Kurtz MJ. 2007. Learning to Improve: Using
Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education
Biology CBE Life Sci Educ 6(2): 140-154.
Zohar A, Weinberger Y and Tamir P. 1994. The effect of the
biology critical thinking project on the development of critical
thinking. Journal of Res. Sci. Teachiing 31(2): 183-196.
4 Strategies Designed to Drive Metacognitive Thinking by Catlin Tucker Metacognition is defined as thinking about one’s t...
Inspirations of passions
Make your interests gradually wider and more impersonal, until bit by bit the walls of the ego recede, and your life becomes increasingly merged in the universal life. An individual human existence should be like a river — small at first, narrowly contained within its banks, and rushing passionately past rocks and over waterfalls. Gradually the river grows wider, the banks recede, the waters flow more quietly, and in the end, without any visible break, they become merged in the sea, and painlessly lose their individual being.